|
Post by bowdowntoanette on May 22, 2004 8:16:18 GMT -5
I saw Taking Lives yesterday. Cool movie, altho a bit predictable. And for the first time in years I actually jumped in my seat! Good scare and gross elements. But I wouldn't recomment watching it if you don't like Angelina Jolie. But if you do, she is über hot in that movie!
@nette
|
|
|
Post by xnightx on May 22, 2004 15:17:47 GMT -5
I wanted to see that. But I just didn't have the motivation to get up and go.
|
|
|
Post by zachisfair on May 22, 2004 18:37:37 GMT -5
Angelina is hot in that movie, and so is that hotass dude at the beginning that gets kicked in front of the car.
predicatble, but a goodie.
|
|
|
Post by bowdowntoanette on May 22, 2004 19:38:57 GMT -5
He's cute in a boyish way..
|
|
|
Post by lilith on May 23, 2004 11:06:06 GMT -5
i've grown very close to dislike Angelina Jolie after all those lame Lara Croft movies i dunno but i guess i expected a little more from her than hot...
|
|
|
Post by bowdowntoanette on May 23, 2004 12:00:32 GMT -5
Angelina is a great actress, there's no doubt about that. But some of her choices in movies have been poor, and that again leads people to patronize her acting skills. Some get it right, tho, like the comments for the first Croft movie, they said the movie sucked, but Angelina did a very good job. As poor as that movie is, I like it, I find it cool that she did all her stunts herself. Not many actresses will jump at the chance of dangling from wires for weeks at a time, running from expotions and tons of water flying at you. So that's pretty cool. I admire her persistence.
@nette
|
|
|
Post by sid on May 23, 2004 16:56:19 GMT -5
I didn't like it. It's crap.
|
|
|
Post by neo on May 28, 2004 9:23:50 GMT -5
I LOVE Angelina.. i loved taking lives.. simple but good movie... as for lara croft, geez.. take it for what it is, its good kick-ass sexy action flick!! hehe... but yeah... it would be shaite without her.
|
|
|
Post by xnightx on May 28, 2004 14:05:03 GMT -5
as for lara croft, geez.. take it for what it is, its good kick-ass sexy action flick!! hehe... but yeah... it would be shaite without her. Yeah, I actually liked those movies.
|
|
Fragile
Sanitation Engineer
My radio's my heart; we live as one
Posts: 220
|
Post by Fragile on May 29, 2004 23:19:45 GMT -5
i like anything involving angelina
|
|
|
Post by cmonshirl on May 30, 2004 5:10:24 GMT -5
Tomb Raider is a rare series in which the sequel is better, than the first.
|
|
|
Post by bowdowntoanette on May 30, 2004 8:19:39 GMT -5
i like anything involving angelina Apart from Hackers and that movie where she's a platinum blonde tv reporter or what ever (I haven't seen that movie yet, not too tempted either).. Tomb Raider is a rare series in which the sequel is better, than the first. I actually prefer the first one. I hate the intro to the second, with the underwater bits and the sharks......... good god, it was too Baywatch, ie pisspoor effects. It got better after that, tho. @nette
|
|
|
Post by kao on May 30, 2004 14:44:05 GMT -5
Angelina is beautiful and a good actress. But Lara Croft's movies. Just as bad as Kevin Costner's Waterworld.
|
|
|
Post by bowdowntoanette on May 30, 2004 17:30:48 GMT -5
She is.... In fact, she's the only woman I would consider going to bed with.
@nette
|
|
|
Post by lilith on May 31, 2004 9:35:16 GMT -5
it's not just Lara Croft... she's desperately in need of a breakthrough. she's got the talent & the character & the looks & all. it would be a BIG waste if she doesn't meet a good role like Moster for Charliez Theron...
|
|
|
Post by audio on May 31, 2004 12:17:51 GMT -5
WTF is a "moster"?
|
|
|
Post by bowdowntoanette on May 31, 2004 13:05:18 GMT -5
it's not just Lara Croft... she's desperately in need of a breakthrough. she's got the talent & the character & the looks & all. it would be a BIG waste if she doesn't meet a good role like Moster for Charliez Theron... Two words; girl, interrupted! She won an Oscar for her part in that. Which is, btw, still packed down in it's box(just read about it). @nette
|
|
|
Post by xnightx on May 31, 2004 16:09:19 GMT -5
But her career does need a serious shot of adrenaline. Her last 5 movies bombed. But I just checked out her page on IMDB, and she's got 5 more coming out this year alone, so at least one has to do well. The one with Brad Pitt should probably do her some good.
|
|
|
Post by xnightx on May 31, 2004 16:11:48 GMT -5
By the way, what did everybody think of "Monster?" I usually hate when the hype machine goes on and on about one performance, but they were right this time. Theron was unbelievable. Oscar worthy? maybe, maybe not.
But she seems to already be going down the same post Oscar road as Jolie. She's doing an Aeon Flux movie (a la Lara Croft).
|
|
|
Post by lilith on Jun 2, 2004 7:29:53 GMT -5
i loved *MONSTER( )* i have to say i never expected Theron to give such a compelling performance. maybe she's not the definite choice for oscar but i think she deserves it. but again, i'm afraid she might reeat that old path... i mean Swank... i mean Berry... i mean Johansson(that Perfect Score,eek> )... i mean, i hate to say it, Jolie. it seems once a pretty girl wins a major award her later performance always suck... the only exception is Nicole Kidman. she's always full of surprise.
|
|